Comments on: Stop The Presses: Soldier Refuses Deployment

By: Zeppo

Zeppo — Tue, 20 May 2008 22:46:28 +0000

Why isn't Drudge reporting this? Someone should send this to him and LGF.

By: Right Voices » Blog Archive » Stop The Presses: Soldier Refuses Deployment..well a PHOTOGRAPHER refuses to deploy

Tue, 20 May 2008 13:50:09 +0000

[...] does a fine job with this one Bookmark [...]

By: Jen06

Jen06 — Tue, 20 May 2008 00:03:14 +0000

Steve and JD – You are idiots. Go play in traffic.

JD – I would be certain that a lot of your Semper Fi buddies are also praising God that you won't be going back to Iraq. You are one of those that will probably be known as an ex-Marine instead of former Marine.

By: Thus Spake Ortner

Thus Spake Ortner — Mon, 19 May 2008 11:49:19 +0000

"Like APFSDS-T, MELIOS, HMFICoKIR, and BOHICA.)"

I prefer FUBIJANG.

F U Buddy, I'm Just a National Guardsman.

Also, I may be mistaken, but isn't a Government Trademark open to Fair Use? I know it is in Copyright.

By: Steve

Steve — Mon, 19 May 2008 10:53:43 +0000

I am sure Chiroux says he is pro military too. But like the web site administrators he too is breaking the law.

By: dagamore

dagamore — Mon, 19 May 2008 06:22:18 +0000

Steve

Good work, since you are unable to attack the subject of the article, or the analysis of the story. Or support the IRR loser in anyway shape or form, you do what all liberals do when attacked with facts that they don%u2019t agree with. They attack, poorly in your case as normal, the people showing/telling the facts.

Good job, it gives me hope.

Good read as always. Hopefully the Army will drop on him like a ton of bricks.

JD
While the war in Iraq might be unjustified and or immoral, it is not illegal it was made legal by the US Congress on October 11 2002. Now for this war to be illegal they would have to pass another resolution that would remove authorization and funding for this 'war'. Until they do this the war is not illegal. Now You and I could go round and round about how immoral it is to remove a mass murdering dictator from power, or we could go on about how unjustified it is to remove from power a government that is funding terrorism around the glob. But I don%u2019t think that this is the forum for that. If you want and are willing to do it civilly feel free to email me. @ dagamore(nospam)@gmail(nospam).com

By: JD

JD — Mon, 19 May 2008 01:42:01 +0000

Very encouraging! Good for Matthis Chiroux! It makes me proud that Americans are standing up for American values. The time is coming when those in positions of power realize that Bush's war of terror in Iraq is illegal, immoral, and unjustified.

Praise be to God that I am never going back to Iraq!

Semper Fidelis!

By: Sharon

Sharon — Sun, 18 May 2008 14:28:43 +0000

If Steve were a truly decent person, he would have e-mailed CJ about his "concerns." I bet the army has the same concerns as Dunkin' Donuts would if a donut shop infringed on the name. You are an idiot. A pro-Army site uses the trademark and the army is harmed in the marketplace how? What kind of damages will be shown?

"With that logic I should be able to go to the nearest armory and sign out a weapon and some ammunition and blaze away. After all my tax dollars paid for it."

Your analogy is ridiculous.

Keep up the good work, CJ.

By: Steve

Steve — Sun, 18 May 2008 12:21:43 +0000

"Who paid for said trademark? DoD? DA? Did they do it with some funding that WASN'T provided by the taxpayer?"
With that logic I should be able to go to the nearest armory and sign out a weapon and some ammunition and blaze away. After all my tax dollars paid for it.

How are the administrators of this web site any different than Chiroux? They are pro military patriots when it is convenient but when it's not they are all too willing to "stick it to the man". If you really love your country follow it's rule and laws. If you respect the military you shouldn't use their trademarks without permission.

By: Chuck

Chuck — Sun, 18 May 2008 04:20:07 +0000

Steve,
Yes, the logo is a trademark…
But it isn't an "Army of One" any more, it's "Army Strong" now. And that's also a patch worn in the Army (mostly 'round the five-sided puzzle palace.)

Who paid for said trademark? DoD? DA? Did they do it with some funding that WASN'T provided by the taxpayer?

Now quit quibbling, you retard. CJ and I have forgotten more acronyms than most people will ever know. (Like APFSDS-T, MELIOS, HMFICoKIR, and BOHICA.)
Anyway, why do we call them winter soldiers? Isn't Sunshine Patriots more apropos?

The point of the post is to illustrate the douchebaggery of chiroux, the IAVA, the idiots in congress who held this "hearing" and the faulty, biased reporting without fact checking.