<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: President Addresses Steps Taken to Protect the Safety and Security of the American People</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.soldiersperspective.us/2010/01/02/president-addresses-steps-taken-to-protect-the-safety-and-security-of-the-american-people/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.soldiersperspective.us/2010/01/02/president-addresses-steps-taken-to-protect-the-safety-and-security-of-the-american-people/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=president-addresses-steps-taken-to-protect-the-safety-and-security-of-the-american-people</link>
	<description>Military Blog - A Soldier&#039;s Perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 01:02:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: wheninthecourse</title>
		<link>http://www.soldiersperspective.us/2010/01/02/president-addresses-steps-taken-to-protect-the-safety-and-security-of-the-american-people/#comment-54374</link>
		<dc:creator>wheninthecourse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 04:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.soldiersperspective.us/?p=6444#comment-54374</guid>
		<description>Holy ShEET
did you see his latest executive order (today)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2426271/posts</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Holy ShEET<br />
did you see his latest executive order (today)<br />
<a href="http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2426271/posts" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2426271/posts'>freerepublic....426271/posts</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen Teeter</title>
		<link>http://www.soldiersperspective.us/2010/01/02/president-addresses-steps-taken-to-protect-the-safety-and-security-of-the-american-people/#comment-54355</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen Teeter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 21:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.soldiersperspective.us/?p=6444#comment-54355</guid>
		<description>Critical, you gotta be kidding me! Is THAT all you supporters of the white house can come up with?? Playing &quot;the race card&quot; when you encounter facts you cannot prove false? 

WE are a bi-racial family! Even were we not, liberal talking-heads on tv like Maddow, etc. that call we conservatives racists ARE the racists. See this link about the book of the year that exposes the racists in the liberal party. 

http://politics.theatlantic.com/2010/01/game_change_even_more_juicy_stuff.php

I have a really cool suggestion! You and BobtheLiberal both go to the thread at this blog titled &quot;Reform Congress&quot; and read or reread my several posts and explain my points that prove the Communism in the liberal party. 

Then, watch Glenn Beck to disprove him and get back to me. You can&#039;t disprove him because his team of researchers have so much information now that they have built a good argument for impeachments in DC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Critical, you gotta be kidding me! Is THAT all you supporters of the white house can come up with?? Playing &#034;the race card&#034; when you encounter facts you cannot prove false? </p>
<p>WE are a bi-racial family! Even were we not, liberal talking-heads on tv like Maddow, etc. that call we conservatives racists ARE the racists. See this link about the book of the year that exposes the racists in the liberal party. </p>
<p><a href="http://politics.theatlantic.com/2010/01/game_change_even_more_juicy_stuff.php" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://politics.theatlantic.com/2010/01/game_change_even_more_juicy_stuff.php'>politics.thea...cy_stuff.php</a></p>
<p>I have a really cool suggestion! You and BobtheLiberal both go to the thread at this blog titled &#034;Reform Congress&#034; and read or reread my several posts and explain my points that prove the Communism in the liberal party. </p>
<p>Then, watch Glenn Beck to disprove him and get back to me. You can&#039;t disprove him because his team of researchers have so much information now that they have built a good argument for impeachments in DC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob the Liberal</title>
		<link>http://www.soldiersperspective.us/2010/01/02/president-addresses-steps-taken-to-protect-the-safety-and-security-of-the-american-people/#comment-54349</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob the Liberal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 16:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.soldiersperspective.us/?p=6444#comment-54349</guid>
		<description>Yes, let&#039;s keep drinking the grape Kool-Aide, shall we?

This is why I want to eliminate political parties. Let&#039;s drown out the Republican mantra, shall we? SOCIALIST, COMMUNIST, BIRTHER!

At current count we have 5735 nuclear warheads active and immediately useable of various yields. Over 5000 of these are &quot;strategic&quot; weapons. We have another 4225 stockpiled, and could be made active quickly. Under the SORT treaty, SIGNED BY BUSH AND RATIFIED BY A REPUBLICAN CONGRESS, we need to drop below the 2200 level by 2012. Who&#039;s going to be throwing nukes at us? Russia? They couldn&#039;t find the button to push with a road map, compass and a GPS, if they figured how to work it. China has 105, India 30-35, Pakistan 3-5, and N. Korea 1-3. Of these, N. Korea is the only real threat, and they don&#039;t have a missile that can hit the US yet. They tried, but it failed miserably.

The only real nuke threat these days are a rogue state or group. That is the threat. Not some country throwing nukes at us. Not anymore.

(Sources are wikipedia.com and fas.org)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, let&#039;s keep drinking the grape Kool-Aide, shall we?</p>
<p>This is why I want to eliminate political parties. Let&#039;s drown out the Republican mantra, shall we? SOCIALIST, COMMUNIST, BIRTHER!</p>
<p>At current count we have 5735 nuclear warheads active and immediately useable of various yields. Over 5000 of these are &#034;strategic&#034; weapons. We have another 4225 stockpiled, and could be made active quickly. Under the SORT treaty, SIGNED BY BUSH AND RATIFIED BY A REPUBLICAN CONGRESS, we need to drop below the 2200 level by 2012. Who&#039;s going to be throwing nukes at us? Russia? They couldn&#039;t find the button to push with a road map, compass and a GPS, if they figured how to work it. China has 105, India 30-35, Pakistan 3-5, and N. Korea 1-3. Of these, N. Korea is the only real threat, and they don&#039;t have a missile that can hit the US yet. They tried, but it failed miserably.</p>
<p>The only real nuke threat these days are a rogue state or group. That is the threat. Not some country throwing nukes at us. Not anymore.</p>
<p>(Sources are wikipedia.com and fas.org)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Critical Facts</title>
		<link>http://www.soldiersperspective.us/2010/01/02/president-addresses-steps-taken-to-protect-the-safety-and-security-of-the-american-people/#comment-54332</link>
		<dc:creator>Critical Facts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 21:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.soldiersperspective.us/?p=6444#comment-54332</guid>
		<description>Karen:

Cry me a river and then get real.  We are all &quot;true Americans,&quot; and your inference otherwise evidences just how truly ill-informed you have become in your hatred for a black president.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Karen:</p>
<p>Cry me a river and then get real.  We are all &#034;true Americans,&#034; and your inference otherwise evidences just how truly ill-informed you have become in your hatred for a black president.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NY-David</title>
		<link>http://www.soldiersperspective.us/2010/01/02/president-addresses-steps-taken-to-protect-the-safety-and-security-of-the-american-people/#comment-54211</link>
		<dc:creator>NY-David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 17:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.soldiersperspective.us/?p=6444#comment-54211</guid>
		<description>The sad fact is that we have to have our guard up 24/7.  Those that wish to do us harm only have to be right once.
The other sad fact that the above responses indicate that partisan politics rule above solutions.  Here&#039;s hoping that 2010 will show a change.  &quot;Voting the bums out&quot; doesn&#039;t always work, only brings in new bums.
The Constitution wasn&#039;t perfect, that&#039;s why we have &quot;amendments&quot;.
Happy New Year, All!
NY-David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sad fact is that we have to have our guard up 24/7.  Those that wish to do us harm only have to be right once.<br />
The other sad fact that the above responses indicate that partisan politics rule above solutions.  Here&#039;s hoping that 2010 will show a change.  &#034;Voting the bums out&#034; doesn&#039;t always work, only brings in new bums.<br />
The Constitution wasn&#039;t perfect, that&#039;s why we have &#034;amendments&#034;.<br />
Happy New Year, All!<br />
NY-David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen Teeter</title>
		<link>http://www.soldiersperspective.us/2010/01/02/president-addresses-steps-taken-to-protect-the-safety-and-security-of-the-american-people/#comment-54181</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen Teeter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 21:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.soldiersperspective.us/?p=6444#comment-54181</guid>
		<description>&quot;He&quot; is an appeaser to those that hate us, and yet a bully to we True Americans. Did you miss the reports, yes true and confirmed about how Rahm was sent a letter by a congressional leader, Issa was the guy&#039;s name, telling Rahm to knock it off, it being the bullying tactics. The letter said &quot;this isn&#039;t Chicago&quot; and that bullying Congress AND some governors of some states would not be acceptable. 

BO is &quot;strong before the weak and yet weak before the strong.&quot; This man is peculiar. WHY does he want a &quot;Civilian Security Force&quot; AS strong, big and as well-funded as our military?!&quot; Indeed Hitler had his SS and they answered only to him. 

Dontcha think our military will suffer from not being as funded as it should be if BO gets his Security force? 

Bullies understand nothing but strength. They don&#039;t talk nice and then keep their own agreements. NINETY PERCENT is a huge amount and we should never say we&#039;ll disarm even partially. It&#039;s as stupid as putting a sign on the front of your home that by golly, you&#039;ll get rid of four guns and only keep one. 

We are less safe with this peculiar man in the oval office. He is determined to &quot;fundamentally change&quot; our nation and he will &quot;micro manage&quot; our lives. He wants to be mama to us all, and mama can be a wytch when she gives us everything we need, cradle to grave, as the cliche goes. 

Govt. needs to get OUT of our way and we will live our lives. BO wants to be IN between us and everything in our lives because THAT is what communist leaders do, and his mentor was an admitted Communist, reportedly a man named Frank Davis. 

This president needs to be indicted for already having betrayed his oath of office, to defend the constitution instead of destroying it, nullifying it. (have not not heard recording of him on Chicago, Pulic radion in 2001, I think the date was and he was saying what was wrong with our Constitution? It didn&#039;t go far enough in aiding &quot;redistribution,&quot; yada yada. 

Nothing is wrong with our constitution and the folks that voted this man in were FOOLED by that mantra, &quot;change.&quot; They rightly thought it meant CHANGE in their lives in a good way, but we now can see he meant CHANGE in the foundations of this nation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#034;He&#034; is an appeaser to those that hate us, and yet a bully to we True Americans. Did you miss the reports, yes true and confirmed about how Rahm was sent a letter by a congressional leader, Issa was the guy&#039;s name, telling Rahm to knock it off, it being the bullying tactics. The letter said &#034;this isn&#039;t Chicago&#034; and that bullying Congress AND some governors of some states would not be acceptable. </p>
<p>BO is &#034;strong before the weak and yet weak before the strong.&#034; This man is peculiar. WHY does he want a &#034;Civilian Security Force&#034; AS strong, big and as well-funded as our military?!&#034; Indeed Hitler had his SS and they answered only to him. </p>
<p>Dontcha think our military will suffer from not being as funded as it should be if BO gets his Security force? </p>
<p>Bullies understand nothing but strength. They don&#039;t talk nice and then keep their own agreements. NINETY PERCENT is a huge amount and we should never say we&#039;ll disarm even partially. It&#039;s as stupid as putting a sign on the front of your home that by golly, you&#039;ll get rid of four guns and only keep one. </p>
<p>We are less safe with this peculiar man in the oval office. He is determined to &#034;fundamentally change&#034; our nation and he will &#034;micro manage&#034; our lives. He wants to be mama to us all, and mama can be a wytch when she gives us everything we need, cradle to grave, as the cliche goes. </p>
<p>Govt. needs to get OUT of our way and we will live our lives. BO wants to be IN between us and everything in our lives because THAT is what communist leaders do, and his mentor was an admitted Communist, reportedly a man named Frank Davis. </p>
<p>This president needs to be indicted for already having betrayed his oath of office, to defend the constitution instead of destroying it, nullifying it. (have not not heard recording of him on Chicago, Pulic radion in 2001, I think the date was and he was saying what was wrong with our Constitution? It didn&#039;t go far enough in aiding &#034;redistribution,&#034; yada yada. </p>
<p>Nothing is wrong with our constitution and the folks that voted this man in were FOOLED by that mantra, &#034;change.&#034; They rightly thought it meant CHANGE in their lives in a good way, but we now can see he meant CHANGE in the foundations of this nation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob the Liberal</title>
		<link>http://www.soldiersperspective.us/2010/01/02/president-addresses-steps-taken-to-protect-the-safety-and-security-of-the-american-people/#comment-54171</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob the Liberal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 12:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.soldiersperspective.us/?p=6444#comment-54171</guid>
		<description>Yes, he&#039;s destroying all those nukes. Its called keeping our word. The US has a bad history when it comes to treaties. We sign a treaty, just to end something, and then break it immediately.

We have 200 times the amount of nukes anyone else has. What do we need that many for? To prove we can turn the entire world to glass and asphalt? Everyone already knows we can do that. This is just eliminating the overkill. And alot of these weapons are old and getting unstable. That makes them dangerous just to store. Best to destroy them so they don&#039;t go off accidentally somewhere.

What, you think Russia will launch nukes at us? Their nukes don&#039;t even work. They bluffed us for 40 years. Every single Cold War incident was bluff and bravado. They had no confidence that any of their missiles would even get off the ground.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, he&#039;s destroying all those nukes. Its called keeping our word. The US has a bad history when it comes to treaties. We sign a treaty, just to end something, and then break it immediately.</p>
<p>We have 200 times the amount of nukes anyone else has. What do we need that many for? To prove we can turn the entire world to glass and asphalt? Everyone already knows we can do that. This is just eliminating the overkill. And alot of these weapons are old and getting unstable. That makes them dangerous just to store. Best to destroy them so they don&#039;t go off accidentally somewhere.</p>
<p>What, you think Russia will launch nukes at us? Their nukes don&#039;t even work. They bluffed us for 40 years. Every single Cold War incident was bluff and bravado. They had no confidence that any of their missiles would even get off the ground.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen Teeter</title>
		<link>http://www.soldiersperspective.us/2010/01/02/president-addresses-steps-taken-to-protect-the-safety-and-security-of-the-american-people/#comment-54151</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen Teeter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 21:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.soldiersperspective.us/?p=6444#comment-54151</guid>
		<description>This president is a giant, walking contradiction like none other! He speaks about working for safety while he talks of destroying NINETY-percent of our nukes, as if the bully nations around us will put down their rocks if we put down ours. 

I wish I could respect him, but he isn&#039;t trustworthy nor has he earned anything but my suspicion and criticisms. 

We, the people will make ourselves safe by being politically active, calm, and having the resolve to vote almost all of congress out because they are supporting and ENABLING this peculiar administration in the white house to &quot;micro-manage&quot; our lives and intrude where they have no business being.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This president is a giant, walking contradiction like none other! He speaks about working for safety while he talks of destroying NINETY-percent of our nukes, as if the bully nations around us will put down their rocks if we put down ours. </p>
<p>I wish I could respect him, but he isn&#039;t trustworthy nor has he earned anything but my suspicion and criticisms. </p>
<p>We, the people will make ourselves safe by being politically active, calm, and having the resolve to vote almost all of congress out because they are supporting and ENABLING this peculiar administration in the white house to &#034;micro-manage&#034; our lives and intrude where they have no business being.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention President Addresses Steps Taken to Protect the Safety and Security of the American People &#124; A Soldier's Perspective -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.soldiersperspective.us/2010/01/02/president-addresses-steps-taken-to-protect-the-safety-and-security-of-the-american-people/#comment-54143</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention President Addresses Steps Taken to Protect the Safety and Security of the American People &#124; A Soldier's Perspective -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 11:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.soldiersperspective.us/?p=6444#comment-54143</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by sldrperspective, alexandria davis. alexandria davis said: BlogsIRead President Addresses Steps Taken to Protect the Safety and Security of the American People: ... http://bit.ly/8PQmib #militarymon [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by sldrperspective, alexandria davis. alexandria davis said: BlogsIRead President Addresses Steps Taken to Protect the Safety and Security of the American People: &#8230; <a href="http://bit.ly/8PQmib" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://bit.ly/8PQmib'>http://bit.ly/8PQmib</a> #militarymon [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
